Skip to content
ENG ՀԱՅ
← Back

Agency brief

Period: 06 Apr 2020 – 04 Sept 2021 · Submissions: 29

Executive summary

Model-generated

The citizen submissions routed to the National Security Service (NSS) focus heavily on institutional governance, emergency-period powers, and public trust. Key concerns center on the security sector's personnel policies—specifically the lack of a domestic intelligence academy and perceived outdated promotion structures—alongside anxieties regarding the potential abuse of surveillance laws. Additionally, during active states of emergency, citizens call for decisive action against online disinformation, though these demands often bypass established legal boundaries. Addressing these issues requires the NSS to balance robust national security operations with transparent oversight and strategic institutional reforms.

Urgency signals

No urgency signals this period.

Focus areas

Model-generated

A request can support more than one focus area, so supporting counts do not sum to the submission total.

  1. 0 supporting requests

    Public anxiety during emergencies drives demands for immediate state intervention against perceived destabilizing disinformation.

    • · Establish a joint protocol with the Commission on Television and Radio regarding legal thresholds for emergency disinformation. · Within 30 days
  2. 0 supporting requests

    The lack of domestic training infrastructure is flagged as a long-term sovereign vulnerability that influences recruitment quality.

    • · Initiate a feasibility study with the Foreign Intelligence Service on establishing a domestic national security training framework. · Within 90 days
    • · Conduct an internal audit of personnel promotion policies to ensure merit-based advancement and address legacy institutional practices. · Within 90 days
  3. 0 supporting requests

    Legislative expansions of surveillance powers during emergencies trigger immediate public concerns regarding civil liberties.

    • · Convene a joint policy review with the Ministry of Justice to draft public-facing guidelines on surveillance safeguards. · Within 30 days
Systemic patterns
  • Sovereign Training Deficit in National Intelligence

    The reliance on foreign educational institutions for training national security and intelligence personnel is perceived as a structural vulnerability. Without a domestic academy, the state faces long-term risks regarding the alignment and security of its specialized cadres.

  • Public Trust Deficit in Emergency Surveillance Safeguards

    Expanded legislative tools for location and call tracking during crises generate public anxiety regarding potential abuse by security officers. The lack of visible, independent oversight mechanisms feeds suspicion of internal corruption or political weaponization.

Coordination needs

  • Ministry of Internal Affairs · POLICY_ALIGNMENT

    Joint coordination is required on security sector personnel reforms, merit-based promotion standards, and public sector bonus structures.

  • Ministry of Justice · POLICY_ALIGNMENT

    Collaborative legal review is needed to establish robust, transparent safeguards and public assurances regarding surveillance and call-tracking laws.

  • Commission on Television and Radio · SHARED_CASE_HANDLING

    Addressing emergency-period disinformation and requests to block media channels requires clear division of labor and legal protocols between the regulator and security services.

  • Foreign Intelligence Service · POLICY_ALIGNMENT

    Developing a concept for a domestic intelligence training academy or specialized security school requires alignment on foreign training risks and educational standards.

What not to overweight

Broad, emotionally driven demands to immediately shut down entire social media platforms or TV channels should not displace the systematic development of legally bounded, targeted mechanisms for countering disinformation.