Skip to content
ENG ՀԱՅ
← Back

Agency brief

Period: 06 Apr 2020 – 04 Sept 2021 · Submissions: 11

Executive summary

Model-generated

The submission batch for the First Instance Courts highlights a critical tension between highly visible political demands and urgent, vulnerable-citizen civil and family cases. While some citizens petition for executive intervention in high-profile criminal prosecutions (violating the principle of judicial independence), the court's immediate operational focus must be directed toward resolving a sensitive child guardianship case involving domestic abuse and facilitating structured resolutions for citizens facing litigation over emergency medical debt.

Urgency signals

  • High Unresolved guardianship of children fleeing domestic abuse

    Children are living with grandparents and attending school only as guests because the guardianship court case remains unresolved, while a criminal case against the abusive father is pending.

    Expedite the guardianship hearing and coordinate with local social services to ensure temporary legal status for school enrollment.

    Evidence →

Focus areas

Model-generated

A request can support more than one focus area, so supporting counts do not sum to the submission total.

  1. 01 Child guardianship and domestic abuse proceedings Critical First analysis period
    Supporting count not computable

    Children who fled domestic abuse are currently attending school only as 'guests' due to unresolved legal guardianship status, creating an immediate child welfare concern.

    • · Expedite the guardianship case in Vayk to resolve the children's legal and educational status. · Within 7 days
    • · Establish a fast-track coordination protocol with MLSA and ESCS for court cases involving child protection and school enrollment. · Within 30 days
  2. Supporting count not computable

    Multiple submissions demand that the Prime Minister directly intervene to terminate prosecutions or alter court-ordered preventive measures, indicating a severe public misunderstanding of the separation of powers.

    • · Issue a public clarification reinforcing the constitutional independence of the judiciary from executive interference. · Within 30 days
  3. Supporting count not computable

    Vulnerable debtors who underwent life-saving surgeries are being taken to court, risking further financial ruin without structured payment pathways.

    • · Promote court-annexed mediation or structured payment plans for civil cases involving emergency medical debt. · Within 90 days
Systemic patterns
  • Executive intervention expectations in judicial matters

    There is a recurring public belief that the Prime Minister has the authority to halt criminal cases or modify court-ordered preventive measures. This undermines judicial independence and suggests a need for stronger public communication regarding the separation of powers.

  • Collateral social harm from pending guardianship litigation

    Delays in court-ordered guardianship prevent children who have fled abuse from fully enrolling in schools or receiving state benefits, creating a gap where judicial delays cause immediate social harm.

Coordination needs

  • Ministry of Labor and Welfare · SHARED_CASE_HANDLING

    To address the social support and guardianship evaluation for the children in Vayk.

  • Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport · SHARED_CASE_HANDLING

    To resolve the 'guest' status of children in school while guardianship is pending.

  • Prosecutor General's Office · SHARED_CASE_HANDLING

    High-profile criminal cases and preventive measures involve both the courts and the prosecution.

  • Ministry of Health · SHARED_CASE_HANDLING

    Medical debt litigation cases where patients cannot pay for emergency surgeries.

What not to overweight

Demands for direct executive intervention in active criminal prosecutions (such as the Sanasaryan or Kocharyan cases) should not displace the court's focus on resolving urgent, vulnerable-citizen cases like child guardianship and medical debt.